Complexity Thinking: A Middle Way for Analysts
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper explores the implications of the incompressibility of complex systems for the analysis and modelling of such systems. In particular, a provisional epistemology (theory of knowledge) will be developed that attempts to remain faithful to the limitations derived from this aspect of complexity science. We will argue that such an investigation of complex systems highlights the relevance of paradigmatic pluralism or eclecticism, analytical creativity and boundary critique, and therefore has some affinity to the writings on affirmative postmodernism. Complexity thinking (i.e. thinking based on insights derived in complexity science), like postmodernism, provides a clear warning as to the dangers of uncritically adopting any ‘black and white’ theoretical position. It encourages the deferral of paradigm selection and a healthy scepticism. In this ‘middle way’ there is equal attention paid to qualitative as well as quantitative approaches to analysis.
منابع مشابه
Using Complexity and Network Concepts to Inform Healthcare Knowledge Translation
Many representations of the movement of healthcare knowledge through society exist, and multiple models for the translation of evidence into policy and practice have been articulated. Most are linear or cyclical and very few come close to reflecting the dense and intricate relationships, systems and politics of organizations and the processes required to enact sustainable improvements. We illus...
متن کاملTime to Shift from Systems Thinking-Talking to Systems Thinking-Action; Comment on “Constraints to Applying Systems Thinking Concepts in Health Systems: A Regional Perspective from Surveying Stakeholders in Eastern Mediterranean Countries”
A recent International Journal of Health Policy and Management (IJHPM) article by Fadi El-Jardali and colleagues makes an important contribution to the literature on health system strengthening by reporting on a survey of healthcare stakeholders in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) about Systems Thinking (ST). The study’s main contributions are its confirmation that healthcare stakeholde...
متن کاملOn the Mid Range: An Exercise in Disposing
statements and complex empirical evidence. In relation to the wide ranging themes in this special edition of ST&HV, this article poses two questions: What have analysts sought from such ‘a’ middle ground? What might have frustrated its establishment in STS as posited by Wyatt and Balmer in the “Introduction” to this special issue? Middle range theorizing has a long pedigree across a number of d...
متن کامل“Wood Already Touched by Fire is not Hard to Set Alight”; Comment on “Constraints to Applying Systems Thinking Concepts in Health Systems: A Regional Perspective from Surveying Stakeholders in Eastern Mediterranean Countries”
A major constraint to the application of any form of knowledge and principles is the awareness, understanding and acceptance of the knowledge and principles. Systems Thinking (ST) is a way of understanding and thinking about the nature of health systems and how to make and implement decisions within health systems to maximize desired and minimize undesired effects. A major constraint to applyi...
متن کاملThe Authoritative Governance in the Middle East And the Process of “Transition to Democracy”
Duringpast two decades, “Pass through a democratic status” gave attention by mostMiddle East analysts. In fact, since the early 1980s, The Middle East and TheNorth of Africa affected by third wave of democratization effects and bothstate and society felt its impacts. Since, civil society has been promoting andstrengthening, from one hand, and sovereign governments gradually withdrawalhas begun,...
متن کامل